The word is out. We have a consensus: Carl Elliott’s book is not worth reading. Hot on the heels of a negative review of a review, another review of those two reviews declares: “I think I’ll pass on White Coat, Black Hat”
The book, based on those two articles and another positive review I recently read seems to be anything but a balanced treatment of the issue. In fact, it comes across as a knee-jerk, intellectually lazy collection of anecdotes designed to appeal to popular animosity against the pharmaceutical industry.
Since Elliott thinks he does not have “any moral expertise more than anybody else,†then why did he write the book? Is he donating the proceeds to ensure that people without insurance can get healthcare? No.
Yowza! Sullivan wisely chose to review another review, rather than wasting money on the book – which, as we all know, would only encourage him. Disappointing, though, that the writer failed to credit this blog’s groundbreaking work in destroying Carl’s credibility. He should get in touch; we’ve got plenty of ideas.
“This guy is a self-righteous prig . . . I don’t know who is more biased, this J.O. or pharma”
-pompous
“I don’t know what self-righteous moon colony Elliott’s living in, but it’s most certainly inhabited by Olympic finger waggers Catherine DeAngelis, Marcia Angell, and Daniel Carpenter. Now there’s a party.”
– bmartinmd
“Obviously, this guy stole these ideas from his brother. Plus, he got them wrong”
– Anonymous
In one day, White Coat, Black Hat has moved to #41,390 on the Amazon.com bestsellers list. On a related note, Dr. Elliott’s September 15 book-signing event has been moved to the sidewalk in front of his house. Look for a white cargo truck with boxes labeled Beacon Press.